Rural School Community Alliance Statement on House Passage of H. 454
April 11, 2025
Cheryl Charles
RSCA Steering Committee Chair
802-376-8093 cherylcharles01@gmail.com
The Rural School Community Alliance appreciates the effort lawmakers have made in recent weeks to respond to the many concerns raised by Vermonters about proposed changes to our public education system. Unfortunately, despite some improvements, H. 454 falls short of addressing the most critical issues facing our rural communities, and it remains deeply concerning in its implications for educational equity, local democracy and the well-being of our children.
H. 454 proposes a dramatic shift away from Vermont’s functioning system of local democratic engagement in school governance. It moves toward centralizing decision-making into fewer school boards with reduced local representation, which would separate communities from decisions that directly impact their children and their schools.
Many school districts in Vermont currently have merger agreements that give towns a say in decisions about school closures. These provisions are essential. When a school faces closure, it is the local community—families, students, and taxpayers—who are most affected. They deserve a voice to ensure that children’s needs are considered, including reasonable bus rides for young learners, thoughtful planning for the reuse of school buildings, and manageable financial impacts for the town. H454 eliminates closure articles of agreement in the formation of the new larger districts. and does not establish a clear process for school closures, creating uncertainty for rural communities.
The combination of larger districts, less representation, goals for minimum class and district size without the protection of a vote of the town impacted, will drive rural school closures statewide.
H454 does not acknowledge the well-documented negative impacts of school closures on children. National research consistently shows that closing community schools’ harms students: disrupts social connections, increases mental health challenges, lowers academic performance in the short term, and reduces family and community engagement.
Similarly, the bill ignores the consequences for rural communities in Vermont, a state that is predominantly rural. School closures lead to population decline, reduced property values, loss of social capital, and difficulties attracting and retaining families. These are not abstract concerns—they are lived realities in towns where schools have already closed.
Vermonters asked for tax relief—not the dismantling of a public education system that generations have worked to build, centered around strong, local community schools. We believe there is a path forward to address education funding in Vermont, and we urge lawmakers to focus on funding reform. Governance reform must be thoughtful, inclusive, and grounded in a commitment to educational equity and community voice. Our children and communities deserve nothing less.